Am 03.08.2016 um 20:09 schrieb Jason Ekstrand:
> There are a number of reasons for this refactor. First, format_rgb9e5.h is
> not something that a user would expect to define such a generic union.
> Second, defining it requires checking for endianness which is ugly. Third,
> 90% of what we were
There are a number of reasons for this refactor. First, format_rgb9e5.h is
not something that a user would expect to define such a generic union.
Second, defining it requires checking for endianness which is ugly. Third,
90% of what we were doing with the union was float <-> uint32_t bitcasts
