On 14.06.2016 18:03, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 7:59 AM, Juha-Pekka Heikkila
> wrote:
ralloc originally had had idea of using malloc but somehow
had slipped in calloc. Without these changes rzalloc
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 7:59 AM, Juha-Pekka Heikkila <
juhapekka.heikk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ralloc originally had had idea of using malloc but somehow
> had slipped in calloc. Without these changes rzalloc did double
> job of zeroing the memory, first calloc and then memset.
> Now change ralloc
ralloc originally had had idea of using malloc but somehow
had slipped in calloc. Without these changes rzalloc did double
job of zeroing the memory, first calloc and then memset.
Now change ralloc to use malloc, leave rzalloc to use calloc and
make needed changes in ralloc functions to get things