Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH V2 10/15] i965: flag new indirect buffer in brw_try_draw_prims

2013-11-07 Thread Paul Berry
On 7 November 2013 14:46, Chris Forbes wrote: > The current plan I think is just to drop the extra state in brw, and > just reference the indirect bo directly when we need it [see Eric's > comment on 09/15] > Ah, ok, that makes sense. Thanks. > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Paul Berry >

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH V2 10/15] i965: flag new indirect buffer in brw_try_draw_prims

2013-11-07 Thread Chris Forbes
The current plan I think is just to drop the extra state in brw, and just reference the indirect bo directly when we need it [see Eric's comment on 09/15] On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Paul Berry wrote: > On 6 November 2013 23:06, Chris Forbes wrote: >> >> Signed-off-by: Chris Forbes >> ---

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH V2 10/15] i965: flag new indirect buffer in brw_try_draw_prims

2013-11-07 Thread Paul Berry
On 6 November 2013 23:06, Chris Forbes wrote: > Signed-off-by: Chris Forbes > --- > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_draw.c | 8 ++-- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_draw.c > b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_draw.c > index e6c3508

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH V2 10/15] i965: flag new indirect buffer in brw_try_draw_prims

2013-11-06 Thread Chris Forbes
Signed-off-by: Chris Forbes --- src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_draw.c | 8 ++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_draw.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_draw.c index e6c3508..9f8ad45 100644 --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_draw.c ++