On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 2:26 AM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 02:08 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 2:05 AM, Timothy Arceri <
>> t_arc...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 01:05 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> > > On Mon, Sep
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 02:33 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 2:26 AM, Timothy Arceri <
> t_arc...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 02:08 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 2:05 AM, Timothy Arceri <
> > > t_arc...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> > > > On
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 3:32 AM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 02:55 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 2:48 AM, Timothy Arceri <
>> t_arc...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 02:33 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> > > On Tue, Sep
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 2:05 AM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 01:05 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Timothy Arceri <
>> t_arc...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>> > Since commit c0cd5b var->data.binding was being used as a
>> >
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 02:08 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 2:05 AM, Timothy Arceri <
> t_arc...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 01:05 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Timothy Arceri <
> > > t_arc...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> > > >
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 01:05 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Timothy Arceri <
> t_arc...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> > Since commit c0cd5b var->data.binding was being used as a
> > replacement
> > for atomic buffer index, but they don't have to be the same value
> > they
>
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 2:48 AM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 02:33 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 2:26 AM, Timothy Arceri <
>> t_arc...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 02:08 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> > > On Tue, Sep
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 02:55 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 2:48 AM, Timothy Arceri <
> t_arc...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 02:33 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 2:26 AM, Timothy Arceri <
> > > t_arc...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> > > > On
Ilia Mirkin writes:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 3:32 AM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
>> On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 02:55 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 2:48 AM, Timothy Arceri <
>>> t_arc...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>>> > On Tue, 2015-09-29 at
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 16:08 +0300, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> Ilia Mirkin writes:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 3:32 AM, Timothy Arceri <
> > t_arc...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 02:55 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 2:48 AM,
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> Since commit c0cd5b var->data.binding was being used as a replacement
> for atomic buffer index, but they don't have to be the same value they
> just happen to end up the same when binding is 0.
>
> Now that we store
Since commit c0cd5b var->data.binding was being used as a replacement
for atomic buffer index, but they don't have to be the same value they
just happen to end up the same when binding is 0.
Now that we store the atomic uniform location in var->data.location
we can use this to lookup the atomic
12 matches
Mail list logo