On 09/02/2011 06:13 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 01:33:59 -0500, Bryan Cain wrote:
>> With this patch, there are no piglit regressions on softpipe with native
>> integers enabled. Unlike my previous patch, this uses integer values of
>> ~0 and 0 for true and false, respectively, i
On 09/02/2011 06:13 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 01:33:59 -0500, Bryan Cain wrote:
>> With this patch, there are no piglit regressions on softpipe with native
>> integers enabled. Unlike my previous patch, this uses integer values of
>> ~0 and 0 for true and false, respectively, i
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 01:33:59 -0500, Bryan Cain wrote:
> With this patch, there are no piglit regressions on softpipe with native
> integers enabled. Unlike my previous patch, this uses integer values of
> ~0 and 0 for true and false, respectively, instead of the float values 1.0
> and 0.0.
This
Are there any objections to pushing this?
Bryan
On 08/31/2011 01:33 AM, Bryan Cain wrote:
> With this patch, there are no piglit regressions on softpipe with native
> integers enabled. Unlike my previous patch, this uses integer values of
> ~0 and 0 for true and false, respectively, instead of t
With this patch, there are no piglit regressions on softpipe with native
integers enabled. Unlike my previous patch, this uses integer values of
~0 and 0 for true and false, respectively, instead of the float values 1.0
and 0.0.
---
src/mesa/main/uniforms.c |6 +-
src/mesa/s