On Sunday, May 8, 2016 10:53:33 PM PDT Jordan Justen wrote:
> On 2016-05-07 03:14:43, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> > My old implementation accumulated pairs in a buffer,
> > and eventually processed that data on the CPU. This meant flushing
> > the batchbuffer and waiting for it to
On 2016-05-07 03:14:43, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> My old implementation accumulated pairs in a buffer,
> and eventually processed that data on the CPU. This meant flushing
> the batchbuffer and waiting for it to completely execute before we
> could map it, resulting in really long
My old implementation accumulated pairs in a buffer,
and eventually processed that data on the CPU. This meant flushing
the batchbuffer and waiting for it to completely execute before we
could map it, resulting in really long stalls. We could also run out
of space in the buffer, and