On 01/04/16 21:35, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> Unless I'm missing something, this series doesn't contain anything that
> uses this patch. Let's drop it for now and put it in with whatever adds
> the actual nir_opt_algebraic changes.
>
Yeah, the user of this will be included in next patch series.
Unless I'm missing something, this series doesn't contain anything that
uses this patch. Let's drop it for now and put it in with whatever adds
the actual nir_opt_algebraic changes.
Another option would be to silently bail if nir_search tries to create an
expression where the opcode has an
Some instructions (like flrp in i965) cannot be lowered depending on the
bit size because it doesn't support all bit sizes.
If the bit size field is defined in nir_opt_algebraic.py, take it into
account.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
---