> I'm pretty sure it will be obsolete in only 240 years too. :)
Ecclesiastes 1:9, alas :P
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 3:59 PM Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote:
>
> > +/**
> > + * struct drm_panfrost_wait_bo - ioctl argument for waiting for
> > + * completion of the last DRM_PANFROST_SUBMIT_CL on a BO.
>
> Nit: Should be plain DRM_PANFROST_SUBMIT, there is no CL for us.
>
> > + __s64 timeout_ns;
> +/**
> + * struct drm_panfrost_wait_bo - ioctl argument for waiting for
> + * completion of the last DRM_PANFROST_SUBMIT_CL on a BO.
Nit: Should be plain DRM_PANFROST_SUBMIT, there is no CL for us.
> + __s64 timeout_ns; /* absolute */
Erm, why is this signed? Semantically, what does
This backend interacts with the new DRM driver for Midgard GPUs which is
currently in development.
When using this backend, Panfrost has roughly on-par functionality as
when using the non-DRM driver from Arm.
Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso
---
v2: - Adapt to changes in the UAPI, mostly one atom
