Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v2 mesa] vk/intel: use negative VK_NO_PROTOTYPES scheme

2016-05-09 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Chad Versace wrote: > On Mon 09 May 2016, Eric Engestrom wrote: > > On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 09:39:58PM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > > On May 1, 2016 6:04 PM, "Kenneth Graunke" > wrote: > > > > On Sunday, May 1,

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v2 mesa] vk/intel: use negative VK_NO_PROTOTYPES scheme

2016-05-09 Thread Chad Versace
On Mon 09 May 2016, Eric Engestrom wrote: > On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 09:39:58PM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > On May 1, 2016 6:04 PM, "Kenneth Graunke" wrote: > > > On Sunday, May 1, 2016 9:51:00 AM PDT Emil Velikov wrote: > > > > Adding the anv authors. > > > > > > > >

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v2 mesa] vk/intel: use negative VK_NO_PROTOTYPES scheme

2016-05-09 Thread Eric Engestrom
On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 09:39:58PM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > On May 1, 2016 6:04 PM, "Kenneth Graunke" wrote: > > On Sunday, May 1, 2016 9:51:00 AM PDT Emil Velikov wrote: > > > Adding the anv authors. > > > > > > Jason, Chad, is there a canonical place where changes

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v2 mesa] vk/intel: use negative VK_NO_PROTOTYPES scheme

2016-05-01 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On May 1, 2016 6:04 PM, "Kenneth Graunke" wrote: > > On Sunday, May 1, 2016 9:51:00 AM PDT Emil Velikov wrote: > > On 28 April 2016 at 19:13, Eric Engestrom wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 05:08:18PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: > > >> On 21

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v2 mesa] vk/intel: use negative VK_NO_PROTOTYPES scheme

2016-05-01 Thread Kenneth Graunke
On Sunday, May 1, 2016 9:51:00 AM PDT Emil Velikov wrote: > On 28 April 2016 at 19:13, Eric Engestrom wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 05:08:18PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: > >> On 21 April 2016 at 11:24, Eric Engestrom wrote: > >> >

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v2 mesa] vk/intel: use negative VK_NO_PROTOTYPES scheme

2016-05-01 Thread Emil Velikov
On 28 April 2016 at 19:13, Eric Engestrom wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 05:08:18PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: >> On 21 April 2016 at 11:24, Eric Engestrom wrote: >> > Commit 3d0fac7aca237bbe8ed8e2a362d3b42d0ef8c46c changed all the >> >

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v2 mesa] vk/intel: use negative VK_NO_PROTOTYPES scheme

2016-04-28 Thread Eric Engestrom
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 05:08:18PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: > On 21 April 2016 at 11:24, Eric Engestrom wrote: > > Commit 3d0fac7aca237bbe8ed8e2a362d3b42d0ef8c46c changed all the > > VK_PROTOTYPES to VK_NO_PROTOTYPES > > This brings the Intel header in line with the

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v2 mesa] vk/intel: use negative VK_NO_PROTOTYPES scheme

2016-04-25 Thread Emil Velikov
On 21 April 2016 at 11:24, Eric Engestrom wrote: > Commit 3d0fac7aca237bbe8ed8e2a362d3b42d0ef8c46c changed all the > VK_PROTOTYPES to VK_NO_PROTOTYPES > This brings the Intel header in line with the rest of the Vulkan code. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH v2 mesa] vk/intel: use negative VK_NO_PROTOTYPES scheme

2016-04-21 Thread Eric Engestrom
Commit 3d0fac7aca237bbe8ed8e2a362d3b42d0ef8c46c changed all the VK_PROTOTYPES to VK_NO_PROTOTYPES This brings the Intel header in line with the rest of the Vulkan code. Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom --- This might break code that was using the old guard scheme (not