Sounds good
On April 23, 2018 18:07:19 Nanley Chery wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:18:54AM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> I think you want to say "clear_color_bo is non-NULL" in the commit message
> rather than talking about addresses. Otherwise, this looks like a
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:18:54AM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> I think you want to say "clear_color_bo is non-NULL" in the commit message
> rather than talking about addresses. Otherwise, this looks like a very
> nice clean-up.
>
To make sure we're on the same page, I made an error in using
I think you want to say "clear_color_bo is non-NULL" in the commit message
rather than talking about addresses. Otherwise, this looks like a very
nice clean-up.
Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 1:42 PM, Nanley Chery wrote:
> We
Looks like this is the last patch in the series that is only cleaning up
the mess I left behind by adding the clear color bo. Thanks for that.
Reviewed-by: Rafael Antognolli
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 01:42:22PM -0700, Nanley Chery wrote:
> We want to add and use a
We want to add and use a getter that turns off the indirect path by
returning zero for the clear address.
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_surface_state.c | 17 ++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_surface_state.c