On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 05:47:06PM -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 4:00 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > Clear rules avoid arguing.
> >
> > I think it'd be good to have an equally solid list on the kms side.
> > But kms is much more meant to be a standard, and the list of
[Shouldn't send mails before coffee kicks in, some things got lost below]
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 10:20 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 05:47:06PM -0500, Rob Clark wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 4:00 AM Daniel Vetter
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Clear rules avoid arguing.
> >
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 4:00 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> Clear rules avoid arguing.
>
> I think it'd be good to have an equally solid list on the kms side.
> But kms is much more meant to be a standard, and the list of userspace
> projects we've accepted in the past is constantly shifting and
>
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:00:17AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Clear rules avoid arguing.
>
> I think it'd be good to have an equally solid list on the kms side.
> But kms is much more meant to be a standard, and the list of userspace
> projects we've accepted in the past is constantly shifting
Clear rules avoid arguing.
I think it'd be good to have an equally solid list on the kms side.
But kms is much more meant to be a standard, and the list of userspace
projects we've accepted in the past is constantly shifting and
adjusting. So I figured I'll leave that as an exercise for later on.
