2017-01-18 18:23 GMT+08:00 Józef Kucia :
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 2:25 AM, Boyan Ding wrote:
>> I don't think I find that. The only place in state tracker where
>> _mesa_add_renderbuffer is called is st_framebuffer_create and only one
>> of the
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 2:25 AM, Boyan Ding wrote:
> I don't think I find that. The only place in state tracker where
> _mesa_add_renderbuffer is called is st_framebuffer_create and only one
> of the front and back buffers is allocated based on the default
> behavior. When
2017-01-18 1:31 GMT+08:00 Brian Paul :
> On 01/17/2017 06:44 AM, Boyan Ding wrote:
>>
>> st will only add back buffer attachment to window framebuffer when
>> visual is in double-buffer mode. However, some applications may
>> render to front buffer even if they have chosen a
On 01/17/2017 06:44 AM, Boyan Ding wrote:
st will only add back buffer attachment to window framebuffer when
visual is in double-buffer mode. However, some applications may
render to front buffer even if they have chosen a double-buffer visual.
In this case, no color buffer will be attached when
st will only add back buffer attachment to window framebuffer when
visual is in double-buffer mode. However, some applications may
render to front buffer even if they have chosen a double-buffer visual.
In this case, no color buffer will be attached when rendering. i965
handles this case