Re: [Mesa-dev] [RFC 0/3] V2: Improve GLSL support of GL_ARB_separate_shader_objects

On Sat, 3 Oct 2015 11:59:49 +0200 gregory hainaut wrote: > On Sat, 03 Oct 2015 09:35:49 + > Mike Lothian wrote: > > > Would it be better to have is_interstage=0 rather than a double negative? > > > Yes. I think it just need to set 1 in the

[Mesa-dev] [RFC 0/3] V2: Improve GLSL support of GL_ARB_separate_shader_objects

> In short, SSO allow to match by name but you can't make any hypothesis on the > previous/next stage. Therefore you must consider all inputs and output as > actives. New version based on Ian's feedbacks. * Real interstage variables of the program are still optimized * Both output and input of

Re: [Mesa-dev] [RFC 0/3] V2: Improve GLSL support of GL_ARB_separate_shader_objects

Would it be better to have is_interstage=0 rather than a double negative? On Sat, 3 Oct 2015 10:32 am Gregory Hainaut wrote: > > In short, SSO allow to match by name but you can't make any hypothesis > on the > > previous/next stage. Therefore you must consider all

Re: [Mesa-dev] [RFC 0/3] V2: Improve GLSL support of GL_ARB_separate_shader_objects

On Sat, 03 Oct 2015 09:35:49 + Mike Lothian wrote: > Would it be better to have is_interstage=0 rather than a double negative? > Yes. I think it just need to set 1 in the constructor (forget to update it by the way...) as default value. Otherwise it can be renamed to