On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote:
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:37:20 -0400
Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com wrote:
One more nail in the coffin of XF86VidMode.
Signed-off-by: Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com
---
I'm not sure how to test this, but the
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:37:20 -0400
Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com wrote:
One more nail in the coffin of XF86VidMode.
Signed-off-by: Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com
---
I'm not sure how to test this, but the translation from XF86VidMode
Xrandr seems to be pretty straightforward. Almost
One more nail in the coffin of XF86VidMode.
Signed-off-by: Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com
---
I'm not sure how to test this, but the translation from XF86VidMode
Xrandr seems to be pretty straightforward. Almost certainly there's
something wrong with it, as this is the first client-side X