Carl Worth writes:
> It probably wouldn't be too hard to fix this code to be more general. I
> might take a whack at that now that I have this test in hand.
It wasn't too hard. I just sent a v2 patch in reply to the original (and
also force-pushed a new glcpp-fixup branch to my repository).
I've
Ian Romanick writes:
> Are the preprocessor patches on the gles3conform-v4 branch of my fd.o
> repo the most up to date?
Yes. The state of those patches matches what I have on my branch, (at
least as far as GLES3 conformance is concerned---I have some subsequent
preprocessor patches which shouldn
Hey Carl.
Are the preprocessor patches on the gles3conform-v4 branch of my fd.o
repo the most up to date? I seem to have lost the patches from my
inbox. :( I've put R-b on almost all of them.
I want to look a little closer at "glsl/glcpp: Fix for macros that
expand to include "defined" operator
