On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 8:33 AM, Scott D Phillips <
scott.d.phill...@intel.com> wrote:
> Jason Ekstrand writes:
>
> > Previously, we only tried to ensure that we didn't shrink either end
> > below what was already handed out. However, due to the way we handle
> >
Jason Ekstrand writes:
> Previously, we only tried to ensure that we didn't shrink either end
> below what was already handed out. However, due to the way we handle
> relocations with block pools, we can't shrink the back end at all. It's
> probably best to not shrink in
Hi,
On 21.04.2018 08:15, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
Previously, we only tried to ensure that we didn't shrink either end
below what was already handed out. However, due to the way we handle
relocations with block pools, we can't shrink the back end at all. It's
probably best to not shrink in