2018-04-27 1:34 GMT+08:00 Rob Herring :
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Emil Velikov
> wrote:
>> On 26 April 2018 at 03:30, Chih-Wei Huang wrote:
>>> 2018-04-25 19:55 GMT+08:00 Robert Foss :
Hey Emil & Chih-Wei,
On 04/24/2018 01:59 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>
> On 24 Apr
2018-04-27 2:19 GMT+08:00 Robert Foss :
>
> I've spent some time today preparing a #ifdef version of what robher
> submitted.
>
> It's fine, but there is no way automatically enable the HAVE_DRM_GRALLOC
> #define through the build tools. So a small simple patch adding the shared
> library dependenc
Hi Rob,
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 12:43 PM Chih-Wei Huang
wrote:
> 2018-04-27 2:19 GMT+08:00 Robert Foss :
> >
> > I've spent some time today preparing a #ifdef version of what robher
> > submitted.
> >
> > It's fine, but there is no way automatically enable the HAVE_DRM_GRALLOC
> > #define through
On 04/26/2018 07:43 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 26 April 2018 at 18:34, Rob Herring wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 26 April 2018 at 03:30, Chih-Wei Huang wrote:
2018-04-25 19:55 GMT+08:00 Robert Foss :
Hey Emil & Chih-Wei,
On 04/24/2018 01:59 PM, Emil Vel
On 26 April 2018 at 18:34, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Emil Velikov
> wrote:
>> On 26 April 2018 at 03:30, Chih-Wei Huang wrote:
>>> 2018-04-25 19:55 GMT+08:00 Robert Foss :
Hey Emil & Chih-Wei,
On 04/24/2018 01:59 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>
> On
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 26 April 2018 at 03:30, Chih-Wei Huang wrote:
>> 2018-04-25 19:55 GMT+08:00 Robert Foss :
>>> Hey Emil & Chih-Wei,
>>>
>>> On 04/24/2018 01:59 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 24 April 2018 at 12:28, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On
On 26 April 2018 at 03:30, Chih-Wei Huang wrote:
> 2018-04-25 19:55 GMT+08:00 Robert Foss :
>> Hey Emil & Chih-Wei,
>>
>> On 04/24/2018 01:59 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>>
>>> On 24 April 2018 at 12:28, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>>
On the topic of keeping the old code behind a #define or just remov
2018-04-25 19:55 GMT+08:00 Robert Foss :
> Hey Emil & Chih-Wei,
>
> On 04/24/2018 01:59 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>
>> On 24 April 2018 at 12:28, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>
>>> On the topic of keeping the old code behind a #define or just removing
>>> it, it'll be great if interested parties can reach
Hey Emil & Chih-Wei,
On 04/24/2018 01:59 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 24 April 2018 at 12:28, Emil Velikov wrote:
On the topic of keeping the old code behind a #define or just removing
it, it'll be great if interested parties can reach a consensus.
Actually one can simply drop this code and
On 24 April 2018 at 12:28, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On the topic of keeping the old code behind a #define or just removing
> it, it'll be great if interested parties can reach a consensus.
>
Actually one can simply drop this code and drm_gralloc users can add a
drm_ioctl_permit() hack.
Namely: loose
Hi Rob,
Thanks for doing this.
There's a couple of small nits, but the patch looks good IMHO.
On the topic of keeping the old code behind a #define or just removing
it, it'll be great if interested parties can reach a consensus.
On 19 April 2018 at 22:09, Rob Herring wrote:
> --- a/src/egl/dr
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 4:26 PM Robert Foss
wrote:
> Hey Chih-Wei,
> On 04/23/2018 04:17 AM, Chih-Wei Huang wrote:
> > What's the impact to drm_gralloc?
> I'm not terribly familiar with drm_gralloc, but as far as I understand it
> depends on flink name support at the moment.
> The overarching
Hey Chih-Wei,
On 04/23/2018 04:17 AM, Chih-Wei Huang wrote:
What's the impact to drm_gralloc?
I'm not terribly familiar with drm_gralloc, but as far as I understand it
depends on flink name support at the moment.
The overarching idea here is to make mesa gralloc independent, but also at the
What's the impact to drm_gralloc?
2018-04-20 5:09 GMT+08:00 Rob Herring :
> Maintaining both flink names and prime fd support which are provided by
> 2 different gralloc implementations is problematic because we have a
> dependency on a specific gralloc implementation header.
>
> This mostly remo
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 6:29 AM, Robert Foss wrote:
> Hey Rob,
>
> This looks good to me.
> Do you mind if I carry this patch my series to get it all pushed upstream at
> once?
No, not at all.
Rob
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.or
Hey Rob,
This looks good to me.
Do you mind if I carry this patch my series to get it all pushed upstream at
once?
Rob.
On 04/19/2018 11:09 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
Maintaining both flink names and prime fd support which are provided by
2 different gralloc implementations is problematic becaus
Hi Rob,
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 6:09 AM Rob Herring wrote:
> Maintaining both flink names and prime fd support which are provided by
> 2 different gralloc implementations is problematic because we have a
> dependency on a specific gralloc implementation header.
> This mostly removes the depende
17 matches
Mail list logo