Am 18.02.2013 20:11, schrieb Roland Scheidegger:
Am 18.02.2013 19:14, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
From: Michel Dänzer michel.daen...@amd.com
11 more little piglits.
NOTE: This is a candidate for the 9.1 branch.
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer michel.daen...@amd.com
---
Any ideas why this seems
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Christian König
deathsim...@vodafone.de wrote:
Am 18.02.2013 20:11, schrieb Roland Scheidegger:
Am 18.02.2013 19:14, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
From: Michel Dänzer michel.daen...@amd.com
11 more little piglits.
NOTE: This is a candidate for the 9.1 branch.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote:
On Die, 2013-02-19 at 10:33 +0100, Christian König wrote:
Am 18.02.2013 20:11, schrieb Roland Scheidegger:
Am 18.02.2013 19:14, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
From: Michel Dänzer michel.daen...@amd.com
11 more little
On Die, 2013-02-19 at 14:04 +0100, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote:
Really, what I don't understand is why r600g doesn't seem affected by
this... at least on my RS880 it's passing the piglit tests this change
fixes with
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote:
On Die, 2013-02-19 at 14:04 +0100, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote:
Really, what I don't understand is why r600g doesn't seem affected by
this... at least on
On Die, 2013-02-19 at 15:48 +0100, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote:
On Die, 2013-02-19 at 14:04 +0100, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote:
Really, what I don't understand
Am 18.02.2013 19:14, schrieb Michel Dänzer:
From: Michel Dänzer michel.daen...@amd.com
11 more little piglits.
NOTE: This is a candidate for the 9.1 branch.
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer michel.daen...@amd.com
---
Any ideas why this seems necessary with radeonsi but not with r600g?
