On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 11:13 AM, Kenneth Graunke
wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 24, 2018 2:03:41 AM PST Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > Instead of keeping an array of booleans, we now hang onto an array of
> > isl_aux_usage enums. This means that the thing we are passing from
On Wednesday, January 24, 2018 2:03:41 AM PST Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> Instead of keeping an array of booleans, we now hang onto an array of
> isl_aux_usage enums. This means that the thing we are passing from
> brw_draw.c to surface state setup is the thing that surface state setup
> actually
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 02:03:41AM -0800, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> Instead of keeping an array of booleans, we now hang onto an array of
> isl_aux_usage enums. This means that the thing we are passing from
> brw_draw.c to surface state setup is the thing that surface state setup
> actually needs