Jan Vesely writes:
> On Tue, 2017-08-15 at 12:00 -0700, Francisco Jerez wrote:
>> Jan Vesely writes:
>>
>> > On Sat, 2017-08-12 at 20:14 -0700, Francisco Jerez wrote:
>> > > Jan Vesely writes:
>> > >
>> > > > On Sat,
On Tue, 2017-08-15 at 12:00 -0700, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> Jan Vesely writes:
>
> > On Sat, 2017-08-12 at 20:14 -0700, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> > > Jan Vesely writes:
> > >
> > > > On Sat, 2017-08-05 at 12:34 -0700, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> > >
Jan Vesely writes:
> On Sat, 2017-08-12 at 20:14 -0700, Francisco Jerez wrote:
>> Jan Vesely writes:
>>
>> > On Sat, 2017-08-05 at 12:34 -0700, Francisco Jerez wrote:
>> > > Francisco Jerez writes:
>> > >
>> > > > Jan
On Sat, 2017-08-12 at 20:14 -0700, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> Jan Vesely writes:
>
> > On Sat, 2017-08-05 at 12:34 -0700, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> > > Francisco Jerez writes:
> > >
> > > > Jan Vesely writes:
> > > >
> > > >
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 4:29 PM, Aaron Watry wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Francisco Jerez
> wrote:
>> Aaron Watry writes:
>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 10:14 PM, Francisco Jerez
>>> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> Aaron Watry writes:
>
>> On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 10:14 PM, Francisco Jerez
>> wrote:
>>> Jan Vesely writes:
>>>
On Sat, 2017-08-05 at 12:34
Aaron Watry writes:
> On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 10:14 PM, Francisco Jerez
> wrote:
>> Jan Vesely writes:
>>
>>> On Sat, 2017-08-05 at 12:34 -0700, Francisco Jerez wrote:
Francisco Jerez writes:
Jan Vesely writes:
> On Sat, 2017-08-05 at 12:34 -0700, Francisco Jerez wrote:
>> Francisco Jerez writes:
>>
>> > Jan Vesely writes:
>> >
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > thanks for detailed explanation. I indeed missed the
On Sat, 2017-08-05 at 12:34 -0700, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> Francisco Jerez writes:
>
> > Jan Vesely writes:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > thanks for detailed explanation. I indeed missed the writeBuffer part
> > > in specs.
> > >
> > > On Wed,
Francisco Jerez writes:
> Jan Vesely writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> thanks for detailed explanation. I indeed missed the writeBuffer part
>> in specs.
>>
>> On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 15:05 -0700, Francisco Jerez wrote:
>>> These changes are somewhat redundant
Jan Vesely writes:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for detailed explanation. I indeed missed the writeBuffer part
> in specs.
>
> On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 15:05 -0700, Francisco Jerez wrote:
>> These changes are somewhat redundant and potentially
>> performance-impacting, the reason is
Hi,
thanks for detailed explanation. I indeed missed the writeBuffer part
in specs.
On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 15:05 -0700, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> These changes are somewhat redundant and potentially
> performance-impacting, the reason is that in the OpenCL API,
> clEnqueueWrite* commands are
These changes are somewhat redundant and potentially
performance-impacting, the reason is that in the OpenCL API,
clEnqueueWrite* commands are specified to block until the memory
provided by the application as origin can be reused safely (i.e. until
soft_copy_op()() runs), not necessarily until
13 matches
Mail list logo