On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 09:28:01PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On 18/10/17 12:15 PM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
> >> On 18.10.2017 10:10, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 09:01:52PM +0200, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
> On 17.1
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 03:20:57PM -0400, Harry Wentland wrote:
> On 2017-10-18 04:10 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 09:01:52PM +0200, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
> >> On 17.10.2017 19:16, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 17
On 2017-10-18 04:10 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 09:01:52PM +0200, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
>> On 17.10.2017 19:16, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 17/10/17 05:04 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 03:46:
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 18/10/17 12:15 PM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
>> On 18.10.2017 10:10, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 09:01:52PM +0200, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
On 17.10.2017 19:16, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 5:40 PM,
On 18/10/17 12:15 PM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
> On 18.10.2017 10:10, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 09:01:52PM +0200, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
>>> On 17.10.2017 19:16, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Michel Dänzer
wrote:
> On 17/10/17 05:04 PM, Danie
On 17.10.2017 21:53, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 09:00:56PM +0200, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
On 17.10.2017 16:09, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 03:46:24PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 17/10/17 02:22 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:28:17PM +020
On 18.10.2017 10:10, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 09:01:52PM +0200, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
On 17.10.2017 19:16, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 17/10/17 05:04 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 03:46:24PM +0200, Miche
On 18/10/17 10:10 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 09:01:52PM +0200, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
>> On 17.10.2017 19:16, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 17/10/17 05:04 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 03:46:24
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 09:01:52PM +0200, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
> On 17.10.2017 19:16, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > On 17/10/17 05:04 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 03:46:24PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > > > On
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 09:00:56PM +0200, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
> On 17.10.2017 16:09, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 03:46:24PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >> On 17/10/17 02:22 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:28:17PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
On 17.10.2017 19:16, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 17/10/17 05:04 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 03:46:24PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 17/10/17 02:22 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:28:17PM +0200, Miche
On 17.10.2017 16:09, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 03:46:24PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 17/10/17 02:22 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:28:17PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 17/10/17 11:34 AM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
Common sense suggests that there nee
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 17/10/17 05:04 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 03:46:24PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>> On 17/10/17 02:22 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:28:17PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 17/10/17
On 17/10/17 05:04 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 03:46:24PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 17/10/17 02:22 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:28:17PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 17/10/17 11:34 AM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
>>>
> Common sense sugges
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 03:46:24PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 17/10/17 02:22 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:28:17PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >> On 17/10/17 11:34 AM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
> >
> >>> Common sense suggests that there need to be two side to FreeSync
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 03:46:24PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 17/10/17 02:22 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:28:17PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >> On 17/10/17 11:34 AM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
> >
> >>> Common sense suggests that there need to be two side to FreeSync
Am 17.10.2017 um 15:46 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
On 17/10/17 02:22 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
[SNIP]
Finally I'm not sure we want to insist on a target time for freesync. At
least as far as I understand things you just want "as soon as possible".
This might change with some of the VK/EGL/GLX extensio
On 17/10/17 02:22 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:28:17PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 17/10/17 11:34 AM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
>
>>> Common sense suggests that there need to be two side to FreeSync / VESA
>>> Adaptive Sync support:
>>>
>>> 1. Query the display capabilit
On 17/10/17 01:04 PM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
> On 17.10.2017 12:28, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 17/10/17 11:34 AM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
>>>
>>> Common sense suggests that there need to be two side to FreeSync / VESA
>>> Adaptive Sync support:
>>>
>>> 1. Query the display capabilities. This means que
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:28:17PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 17/10/17 11:34 AM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I just sent out a patch that enables FreeSync in Mesa for the somewhat
> > hacked implementation of FreeSync that exists in our hybrid (amdgpu-pro)
> > stack's DDX and k
On 17.10.2017 12:28, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 17/10/17 11:34 AM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
Hi all,
I just sent out a patch that enables FreeSync in Mesa for the somewhat
hacked implementation of FreeSync that exists in our hybrid (amdgpu-pro)
stack's DDX and kernel module. [0]
While this patch isn'
On 17/10/17 11:34 AM, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just sent out a patch that enables FreeSync in Mesa for the somewhat
> hacked implementation of FreeSync that exists in our hybrid (amdgpu-pro)
> stack's DDX and kernel module. [0]
>
> While this patch isn't meant for upstream, that's as
22 matches
Mail list logo