From: Lionel Landwerlin
>> - In case the options are different (which is quite likely), how do we query
>> the available options?
>>
>> For OpenGL we have glXGetScreenDriver/glXGetDriverConfig
>>
>> For EGL we have eglGetDisplayDriverName/eglGetDisplayDriverConfig [2]
>>
>> What about Vulkan?
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 4:59 PM Dylan Baker wrote:
> Quoting Zebediah Figura (2019-12-10 10:58:45)
> > On 12/10/19 12:21 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 6:07 PM Dylan Baker
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi everyone,
> > >>
> > >> I think its time we discussed whether we're going to
On 11/12/19 8:54 am, Alex Deucher wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 1:13 PM Dylan Baker wrote:
Do we have those and does anyone notice? I personally rarely look at the list
now unless I'm CC'd on something. That seems really bad for drive by
contributors.
But frankly I wouldn't submit to a
On 11/12/19 5:58 am, Zebediah Figura wrote:
On 12/10/19 12:21 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 6:07 PM Dylan Baker wrote:
Hi everyone,
I think its time we discussed whether we're going to continue to do
patch review
on the mailing list, or if it it should all go through
Quoting Zebediah Figura (2019-12-10 10:58:45)
> On 12/10/19 12:21 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 6:07 PM Dylan Baker wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi everyone,
> >>
> >> I think its time we discussed whether we're going to continue to do patch
> >> review
> >> on the mailing list, or if it
Quoting Alex Deucher (2019-12-10 13:54:02)
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 1:13 PM Dylan Baker wrote:
> >
> > Do we have those and does anyone notice? I personally rarely look at the
> > list
> > now unless I'm CC'd on something. That seems really bad for drive by
> > contributors.
> >
> > But frankly
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 1:13 PM Dylan Baker wrote:
>
> Do we have those and does anyone notice? I personally rarely look at the list
> now unless I'm CC'd on something. That seems really bad for drive by
> contributors.
>
> But frankly I wouldn't submit to a mailing list as a drive by, it's more
On 12/10/19 12:21 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 6:07 PM Dylan Baker wrote:
Hi everyone,
I think its time we discussed whether we're going to continue to do patch review
on the mailing list, or if it it should all go through gitlab. I think we should
stop using the mailing
On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 6:07 PM Dylan Baker wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I think its time we discussed whether we're going to continue to do patch
> review
> on the mailing list, or if it it should all go through gitlab. I think we
> should
> stop using the mailing list, here are some reasons:
>
Adding Daniel (since he could actually turn patchwork off), but I doubt anyone
in mesa is using patchwork at this point, I think all of the people who were
interested have moved to gitlab. We could probably dump it even if we decide to
keep the list.
Just my 2¢.
Dylan
Quoting Marek Olšák
Do we have those and does anyone notice? I personally rarely look at the list
now unless I'm CC'd on something. That seems really bad for drive by
contributors.
But frankly I wouldn't submit to a mailing list as a drive by, it's more work to
get subscribed to mail man (so my patch goes through),
How do we deal with drive by fixes? E.g., some random user submits a
fix but doesn't want to create a gitlab account just to submit a fix?
Whoever reviews the patch should submit an MR?
Alex
On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 6:07 PM Dylan Baker wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I think its time we discussed
Hi Andreas,
that might indeed be something we want to do for Vulkan. I think moving
the defines is fine, however I think that before we start moving data
structures and types around we should probably have a very good
understanding of what we'll need for Vulkan, and that probably requires
that we
13 matches
Mail list logo
