Re: Future direction of the Mesa Vulkan runtime (or "should we build a new gallium?")

2024-01-19 Thread X512
On 2024/01/20 2:01, Faith Ekstrand wrote: We already have several places where we're doing significant layering. It started with sharing the WSI code I wish that it be possible to compile WSI implementation as separate Vulkan layer *.so module instead of hardcoding and duplicating it to each

Re: Future direction of the Mesa Vulkan runtime (or "should we build a new gallium?")

2024-01-19 Thread Mike Blumenkrantz
On one hand I think it's a great idea. Moving code out of drivers to common means fixing bugs helps everyone, and implementing new features is the same. On the other hand, everyone's already got code that works, which means both a lot of work to switch that code over to common and then the usual

Re: Mesa >= 23.3.x and python 2.6 ...

2024-01-19 Thread Stefan Dirsch
Hi Jordan Thanks for digging into this! On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 12:10:37PM -0800, Jordan Justen wrote: > On 2024-01-18 04:37:52, Stefan Dirsch wrote: > > Hi > > > > I noticed that with version 23.3.x Mesa no longer can be built with python > > 2.6. It still worked with Mesa 23.2.1. > > As

Re: Mesa >= 23.3.x no longer supporting python 3.6 ...

2024-01-19 Thread Stefan Dirsch
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 01:37:52PM +0100, Stefan Dirsch wrote: > Hi > > I noticed that with version 23.3.x Mesa no longer can be built with python > 2.6. It still worked with Mesa 23.2.1. Of course I've meant python 3.6. Sorry for the confusion! > It fails with > > [ 95s] Traceback (most

Re: Mesa >= 23.3.x and python 2.6 ...

2024-01-19 Thread Jordan Justen
On 2024-01-18 04:37:52, Stefan Dirsch wrote: > Hi > > I noticed that with version 23.3.x Mesa no longer can be built with python > 2.6. It still worked with Mesa 23.2.1. As mentioned in other emails, this was typo where 3.6 was intended. > > It fails with > > [ 95s] Traceback (most recent

Re: Mesa >= 23.3.x and python 2.6 ...

2024-01-19 Thread Stefan Dirsch
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 12:35:58PM -0500, Matt Turner wrote: > On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 10:22 AM Stefan Dirsch wrote: > > I noticed that with version 23.3.x Mesa no longer can be built with python > > 2.6. It still worked with Mesa 23.2.1. > > For anyone who got this far and was completely

Re: Mesa >= 23.3.x and python 2.6 ...

2024-01-19 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 10:22 AM Stefan Dirsch wrote: > I noticed that with version 23.3.x Mesa no longer can be built with python > 2.6. It still worked with Mesa 23.2.1. For anyone who got this far and was completely incredulous... this (and the subject) is typo'd -- the problem is about

Future direction of the Mesa Vulkan runtime (or "should we build a new gallium?")

2024-01-19 Thread Faith Ekstrand
Yeah, this one's gonna hit Phoronix... When we started writing Vulkan drivers back in the day, there was this notion that Vulkan was a low-level API that directly targets hardware. Vulkan drivers were these super thin things that just blasted packets straight into the hardware. What little code