essage-
From: Emil Velikov [mailto:emil.l.veli...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 9:09 PM
To: Guttula, Suresh <suresh.gutt...@amd.com>
Cc: ML mesa-dev <mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>; Sharma, Deepak
<deepak.sha...@amd.com>; Koenig, Christian <christian
On 11 October 2017 at 07:13, Guttula, Suresh
<suresh.gutt...@amd.com<mailto:suresh.gutt...@amd.com>> wrote:
> HI,
>
>>- why do we need "surfaceless" support
>ChromeOS supports surfacelsess and we need this va enablement for
> surfaceless in c
tps://aka.ms/ghei36>
From: Ilia Mirkin
Sent: Tuesday, October 2, 2018 7:53:09 AM
To: Sharma, Deepak
Cc: ML Mesa-dev; Guttula, Suresh
Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] st/va:Aligned image width and height to 16.
Looking at vlVaGetImage, it looks like it just copie
This patch will return VA_STATUS_ERROR_OPERATION_FAILED incase vaDeriveImage()
failed for non-contiguous planes.This error string is required to support
indirect manner i.e. vaCreateImage()+vaPutImage() incase vaDeriveImage()
failed with VA_STATUS_ERROR_OPERATION_FAILED.
Signed-off-by: suresh
Based on VA Spec,DeriveImage() returns VA_STATUS_ERROR_OPERATION_FAILED if
driver
dont have support for internal surface formats.Currently vaDeriveImage()
failed for non-contiguous planes and operation failed error string is
required to support indirect manner i.e. vaCreateImage()+vaPutImage()
