Re: Possible Performance Regression with Mesa

2024-04-26 Thread Joao Paulo Silva Goncalves
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 5:58 AM Lucas Stach wrote: > Etnaviv added some resource tracking to fix issues with a number of > use-cases, which did add some CPU overhead and might cost some > performance, but should no be as dramatic as the numbers you are seeing > here. Good to know. Thanks! >

Re: Possible Performance Regression with Mesa

2024-04-26 Thread Joao Paulo Silva Goncalves
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 9:08 AM Lucas Stach wrote: > I can reproduce the issue, but sadly there is no simple fix for this, > as it's a bad interaction between some of the new features. > At the core of the issue is the dmabuf-feedback support with the chain > of events being as follows: > 1.

Possible Performance Regression with Mesa

2024-04-25 Thread Joao Paulo Silva Goncalves
Hello all, We might have encountered a performance regression after upgrading from Mesa 2022.0.3 to 2024.0.2. During our automated hardware tests using LAVA, we noticed a lower score on glmark2 when we upgraded from the OpenEmbedded release from Kirkstone to Scartgarth. After conducting some

Re: Possible Performance Regression with Mesa

2024-05-02 Thread Joao Paulo Silva Goncalves
Hi, Just for you to know. I opened an issue on Mesa's gitalb too about the regression https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues/11105. Thanks for the help. Regards, João Paulo Gonçalves