[Mesa-dev] [Bug 105171] performance regression (3x slower) running glamor with PutImage workload (radeonsi)

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105171 Michel Dänzer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 105171] performance regression (3x slower) running glamor with PutImage workload (radeonsi)

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105171 --- Comment #20 from Clemens Eisserer --- Hi Richard, Unfortunatly there was very little interest in tackling the issue itself, despite bisecting it was real pain. For me the problem was "fixed" by switching to amdgpu, a luxury the r300/r600

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 105171] performance regression (3x slower) running glamor with PutImage workload (radeonsi)

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105171 --- Comment #19 from Richard Thier --- Possibly related problem on r300 code paths: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110781

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 105171] performance regression (3x slower) running glamor with PutImage workload (radeonsi)

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105171 --- Comment #18 from Dieter Nützel --- (In reply to Dieter Nützel from comment #17) > (In reply to Clemens Eisserer from comment #16) > > some here, on my Kaveri 7650k results with the patch are basically unchanged > > : >

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 105171] performance regression (3x slower) running glamor with PutImage workload (radeonsi)

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105171 --- Comment #17 from Dieter Nützel --- (In reply to Clemens Eisserer from comment #16) > some here, on my Kaveri 7650k results with the patch are basically unchanged > : > > amdgpu: > 8557.942992 Ops/s; put composition

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 105171] performance regression (3x slower) running glamor with PutImage workload (radeonsi)

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105171 --- Comment #16 from Clemens Eisserer --- some here, on my Kaveri 7650k results with the patch are basically unchanged : amdgpu: 8557.942992 Ops/s; put composition (!); 32x32 should I test with radeon too? Dieter: Just

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 105171] performance regression (3x slower) running glamor with PutImage workload (radeonsi)

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105171 --- Comment #15 from Dieter Nützel --- I can't hardly see any changes.(In reply to Marek Olšák from comment #14) > Can you test this patch? > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/210920/ I see hardly any changes with

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 105171] performance regression (3x slower) running glamor with PutImage workload (radeonsi)

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105171 --- Comment #14 from Marek Olšák --- Can you test this patch? https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/210920/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 105171] performance regression (3x slower) running glamor with PutImage workload (radeonsi)

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105171 Clemens Eisserer changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WORKSFORME |---

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 105171] performance regression (3x slower) running glamor with PutImage workload (radeonsi)

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105171 Marek Olšák changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 105171] performance regression (3x slower) running glamor with PutImage workload (radeonsi)

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105171 --- Comment #11 from Michel Dänzer --- https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/210907/ helps for this benchmark with the r600 driver, but radeonsi already has the same code... Clemens, are you still seeing the problem with

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 105171] performance regression (3x slower) running glamor with PutImage workload (radeonsi)

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105171 --- Comment #10 from Clemens Eisserer --- I bisected the regression again, this time with the benchmark mentioned in the post above (JXRenderMark) and I was agin led to the following commit: [ce@localhost mesa]$ git

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 105171] performance regression (3x slower) running glamor with PutImage workload (radeonsi)

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105171 --- Comment #9 from Clemens Eisserer --- So, shmput10 is now equally fast with Mesa-17.3.6 and Mesa-27.2.4 - however the real-world workload still suffers. Please have a look at

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 105171] performance regression (3x slower) running glamor with PutImage workload (radeonsi)

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105171 --- Comment #8 from Clemens Eisserer --- > If somebody wants to improve this, > the place to start is probably glamor rather than the drivers. I wonder, what could glamor do better (especially for small uploads) than

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 105171] performance regression (3x slower) running glamor with PutImage workload (radeonsi)

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105171 --- Comment #7 from Michel Dänzer --- (In reply to Clemens Eisserer from comment #6) > This still leaves the question to be answered, how/why the nvidia blob can > be magnitudes faster for XPutImage based workloads. If

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 105171] performance regression (3x slower) running glamor with PutImage workload (radeonsi)

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105171 --- Comment #6 from Clemens Eisserer --- Strange, after tinkering around with my system, I cannot reproduce the issue anymore. Even with Mesa-17.3.x x11perf -shnmput10 is now at ~70-80kOps/s - so maybe it was a

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 105171] performance regression (3x slower) running glamor with PutImage workload (radeonsi)

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105171 --- Comment #5 from Dieter Nützel --- Marek, any ideas? My Polaris 20 is somewhat faster, but by no means like Nvidia blob. git revert xxx do NOT work, clean. Someone on Phoronix mentioned that fglrx was even much faster

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 105171] performance regression (3x slower) running glamor with PutImage workload (radeonsi)

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105171 --- Comment #4 from Clemens Eisserer --- just some unrelated, interesting numbers: Sync time adjustment is 0.0355 msecs. 800 reps @ 0.0012 msec (816000.0/sec): ShmPutImage 10x10 square 800 reps @

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 105171] performance regression (3x slower) running glamor with PutImage workload (radeonsi)

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105171 Emil Velikov changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||bisected,

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 105171] performance regression (3x slower) running glamor with PutImage workload (radeonsi)

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105171 Clemens Eisserer changed: What|Removed |Added QA Contact|dri-devel@lists.freedesktop