Re: [Mesa-dev] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/kbl: Remove unused Kabylake pci ids

2017-09-20 Thread Anuj Phogat
Dropping this patch. On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 08:30:47PM +, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> Em Seg, 2017-09-11 às 10:10 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi escreveu: >> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 04:11:33PM +, Anuj Phogat wrote: >> > >

Re: [Mesa-dev] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/kbl: Remove unused Kabylake pci ids

2017-09-12 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 08:30:47PM +, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > Em Seg, 2017-09-11 às 10:10 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi escreveu: > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 04:11:33PM +, Anuj Phogat wrote: > > > See Mesa commits: ebc5ccf and b2dae9f > > > > I believe we need to be in sync between multiple gfx stack

Re: [Mesa-dev] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/kbl: Remove unused Kabylake pci ids

2017-09-12 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Em Seg, 2017-09-11 às 10:10 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi escreveu: > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 04:11:33PM +, Anuj Phogat wrote: > > See Mesa commits: ebc5ccf and b2dae9f > > I believe we need to be in sync between multiple gfx stack > components, > but I  don't believe we should remove ids. > > In the

Re: [Mesa-dev] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/kbl: Remove unused Kabylake pci ids

2017-09-12 Thread Anuj Phogat
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 04:11:33PM +, Anuj Phogat wrote: >> See Mesa commits: ebc5ccf and b2dae9f > > I believe we need to be in sync between multiple gfx stack components, > but I don't believe we should remove

Re: [Mesa-dev] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/kbl: Remove unused Kabylake pci ids

2017-09-11 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 04:11:33PM +, Anuj Phogat wrote: > See Mesa commits: ebc5ccf and b2dae9f I believe we need to be in sync between multiple gfx stack components, but I don't believe we should remove ids. In the past we had cases where we noticed a product group using a listed id to do