Am Mittwoch, 16. Oktober 2013, 16:58:53 schrieb Alexander von Gluck:
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 22:09 +0200, Johannes Obermayr wrote:
Am Dienstag, 15. Oktober 2013, 17:22:54 schrieb Alexander von Gluck:
On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 15:05 -0700, Francisco Jerez wrote:
Johannes Obermayr
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 18:11:07 +0200
Johannes Obermayr johannesoberm...@gmx.de wrote:
Simply make llvm devs to push this fix to all branches (again my words: Sth.
like [...]):
Yeah, I can't make anyone do anything... you have to ask them nicely.
diff --git a/tools/llvm-config/CMakeLists.txt
On Thu, 2013-10-17 at 18:11 +0200, Johannes Obermayr wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 16. Oktober 2013, 16:58:53 schrieb Alexander von Gluck:
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 22:09 +0200, Johannes Obermayr wrote:
Am Dienstag, 15. Oktober 2013, 17:22:54 schrieb Alexander von Gluck:
On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 15:05
Am Dienstag, 15. Oktober 2013, 17:22:54 schrieb Alexander von Gluck:
On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 15:05 -0700, Francisco Jerez wrote:
Johannes Obermayr johannesoberm...@gmx.de writes:
Am Dienstag, 15. Oktober 2013, 12:19:40 schrieben Sie:
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:04:26 +0200
Johannes
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 22:09 +0200, Johannes Obermayr wrote:
Am Dienstag, 15. Oktober 2013, 17:22:54 schrieb Alexander von Gluck:
On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 15:05 -0700, Francisco Jerez wrote:
Johannes Obermayr johannesoberm...@gmx.de writes:
Am Dienstag, 15. Oktober 2013, 12:19:40
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 16:58 -0500, Alexander von Gluck wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 22:09 +0200, Johannes Obermayr wrote:
Am Dienstag, 15. Oktober 2013, 17:22:54 schrieb Alexander von Gluck:
On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 15:05 -0700, Francisco Jerez wrote:
Johannes Obermayr
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 18:34 -0400, Jan Vesely wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 16:58 -0500, Alexander von Gluck wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 22:09 +0200, Johannes Obermayr wrote:
Am Dienstag, 15. Oktober 2013, 17:22:54 schrieb Alexander von Gluck:
On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 15:05 -0700, Francisco
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 18:32 -0500, Alexander von Gluck wrote:
Jan Vesely wrote:
We've seen no other complaints on this issue, so likely it is
something
environmental on your end. (unless an older version of LLVM has an
issue... which is what i'm trying to figure out)
Hi Alex,
Am Montag, 14. Oktober 2013, 16:57:20 schrieb Francisco Jerez:
Alexander von Gluck IV kallis...@unixzen.com writes:
* As discussed on the mailing list,
forced no-rtti breaks C++ public
API's such as the Haiku C++ libGL.so
* -fno-rtti *can* be still set however
instead of blindly
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:04:26 +0200
Johannes Obermayr johannesoberm...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Montag, 14. Oktober 2013, 16:57:20 schrieb Francisco Jerez:
Alexander von Gluck IV kallis...@unixzen.com writes:
* As discussed on the mailing list,
forced no-rtti breaks C++ public
API's such
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:04:26 +0200
Johannes Obermayr johannesoberm...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Montag, 14. Oktober 2013, 16:57:20 schrieb Francisco Jerez:
Alexander von Gluck IV kallis...@unixzen.com writes:
* As discussed on the mailing list,
forced no-rtti breaks C++ public
API's such
Am Dienstag, 15. Oktober 2013, 12:19:40 schrieben Sie:
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:04:26 +0200
Johannes Obermayr johannesoberm...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Montag, 14. Oktober 2013, 16:57:20 schrieb Francisco Jerez:
Alexander von Gluck IV kallis...@unixzen.com writes:
* As discussed on the
Johannes Obermayr johannesoberm...@gmx.de writes:
Am Montag, 14. Oktober 2013, 16:57:20 schrieb Francisco Jerez:
Alexander von Gluck IV kallis...@unixzen.com writes:
* As discussed on the mailing list,
forced no-rtti breaks C++ public
API's such as the Haiku C++ libGL.so
*
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 19:51:19 +0200
Johannes Obermayr johannesoberm...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Dienstag, 15. Oktober 2013, 12:19:40 schrieben Sie:
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:04:26 +0200
Johannes Obermayr johannesoberm...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Montag, 14. Oktober 2013, 16:57:20 schrieb Francisco Jerez:
Johannes Obermayr johannesoberm...@gmx.de writes:
Am Dienstag, 15. Oktober 2013, 12:19:40 schrieben Sie:
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:04:26 +0200
Johannes Obermayr johannesoberm...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Montag, 14. Oktober 2013, 16:57:20 schrieb Francisco Jerez:
Alexander von Gluck IV
On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 15:05 -0700, Francisco Jerez wrote:
Johannes Obermayr johannesoberm...@gmx.de writes:
Am Dienstag, 15. Oktober 2013, 12:19:40 schrieben Sie:
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 17:04:26 +0200
Johannes Obermayr johannesoberm...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Montag, 14. Oktober 2013, 16:57:20
Alexander von Gluck IV kallis...@unixzen.com writes:
* As discussed on the mailing list,
forced no-rtti breaks C++ public
API's such as the Haiku C++ libGL.so
* -fno-rtti *can* be still set however
instead of blindly forcing -fno-rtti,
we can rely on the llvm-config
--cppflags
* As discussed on the mailing list,
forced no-rtti breaks C++ public
API's such as the Haiku C++ libGL.so
* -fno-rtti *can* be still set however
instead of blindly forcing -fno-rtti,
we can rely on the llvm-config
--cppflags output.
If the system llvm is built without
rtti (default),
On 10/13/2013 10:52 AM, Alexander von Gluck IV wrote:
* As discussed on the mailing list,
forced no-rtti breaks C++ public
API's such as the Haiku C++ libGL.so
* -fno-rtti *can* be still set however
instead of blindly forcing -fno-rtti,
we can rely on the llvm-config
--cppflags
On Sun, 2013-10-13 at 12:36 -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
On 10/13/2013 10:52 AM, Alexander von Gluck IV wrote:
* As discussed on the mailing list,
forced no-rtti breaks C++ public
API's such as the Haiku C++ libGL.so
* -fno-rtti *can* be still set however
instead of blindly forcing
20 matches
Mail list logo