On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> Am 18.07.2018 um 19:29 schrieb Marek Olšák:
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 9:44 AM, Roland Scheidegger
>> wrote:
>>> Initially, width/height were actually needed because not all
>>> pipe_surface objects were backed by pipe_resource
Am 18.07.2018 um 19:29 schrieb Marek Olšák:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 9:44 AM, Roland Scheidegger
> wrote:
>> Initially, width/height were actually needed because not all
>> pipe_surface objects were backed by pipe_resource objects (that was ages
>> ago...). Hence the comment when that was
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 9:44 AM, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> Initially, width/height were actually needed because not all
> pipe_surface objects were backed by pipe_resource objects (that was ages
> ago...). Hence the comment when that was fixed, since it was always
> actually possible to derive
Initially, width/height were actually needed because not all
pipe_surface objects were backed by pipe_resource objects (that was ages
ago...). Hence the comment when that was fixed, since it was always
actually possible to derive this from the resource (but a bit too
complex to change all the
From: Dave Airlie
We do need width/height for things, remove the outdated
comment.
---
src/gallium/include/pipe/p_state.h | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/gallium/include/pipe/p_state.h
b/src/gallium/include/pipe/p_state.h
index 809aa087ce0..b55624d698d 100644
---
