From: Tapani Pälli
Changes make copy_propagation_elements pass faster, reducing link
time spent in test case of bug 94477. Does not fix the actual issue
but brings down the total time. No regressions seen in CI.
v2 (idr): Formatting / whitespace fixes. Embed the acp_ref
On 09/30/2016 03:18 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
On 09/29/2016 12:17 AM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
On 09/28/2016 06:14 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
On 09/16/2016 06:21 PM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
Changes make copy_propagation_elements pass faster, reducing link
time spent in test case of bug 94477. Does not
On 09/29/2016 12:17 AM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
>
> On 09/28/2016 06:14 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>> On 09/16/2016 06:21 PM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
>>> Changes make copy_propagation_elements pass faster, reducing link
>>> time spent in test case of bug 94477. Does not fix the actual issue
>>> but brings
On 09/28/2016 06:14 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
On 09/16/2016 06:21 PM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
Changes make copy_propagation_elements pass faster, reducing link
time spent in test case of bug 94477. Does not fix the actual issue
but brings down the total time. No regressions seen in CI.
How does
On 09/16/2016 06:21 PM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
> Changes make copy_propagation_elements pass faster, reducing link
> time spent in test case of bug 94477. Does not fix the actual issue
> but brings down the total time. No regressions seen in CI.
How does this affect the time of a full shader-db run?
Gentle ping to Eric ..
On 09/16/2016 06:21 PM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
Changes make copy_propagation_elements pass faster, reducing link
time spent in test case of bug 94477. Does not fix the actual issue
but brings down the total time. No regressions seen in CI.
Signed-off-by: Tapani Pälli
Changes make copy_propagation_elements pass faster, reducing link
time spent in test case of bug 94477. Does not fix the actual issue
but brings down the total time. No regressions seen in CI.
Signed-off-by: Tapani Pälli
---
For performance measurements, Martina reported