On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Chris Forbes chr...@ijw.co.nz wrote:
I think it would be clearer to do this, rather than 4 parallel checks:
Yes. It's clearer. I will make this change.
if (intel-gen = 7) {
/* rationale ... */
x0 = ROUND_DOWN_TO(x0, 2 * x_align);
y0 =
On 9 July 2013 18:12, Anuj Phogat anuj.pho...@gmail.com wrote:
For HSW GT3 clear rectangle must be aligned to two times the number of
pixels in the table shown in Ivy Bridge PRM, Vol2 Part1 11.7.
It should be safe to do this for all gen7 systems unless we see any
performance regressions. I
On 07/10/2013 11:09 AM, Paul Berry wrote:
On 9 July 2013 18:12, Anuj Phogat anuj.pho...@gmail.com
mailto:anuj.pho...@gmail.com wrote:
For HSW GT3 clear rectangle must be aligned to two times the number of
pixels in the table shown in Ivy Bridge PRM, Vol2 Part1 11.7.
It should be
On 07/09/2013 06:12 PM, Anuj Phogat wrote:
For HSW GT3 clear rectangle must be aligned to two times the number of
pixels in the table shown in Ivy Bridge PRM, Vol2 Part1 11.7.
It should be safe to do this for all gen7 systems unless we see any
performance regressions. I observed no piglit,
I think it would be clearer to do this, rather than 4 parallel checks:
if (intel-gen = 7) {
/* rationale ... */
x0 = ROUND_DOWN_TO(x0, 2 * x_align);
y0 = ROUND_DOWN_TO(y0, 2 * y_align);
x1 = ALIGN(x1, 2 * x_align);
y1 = ALIGN(y1, 2 * y_align);
} else {
x0 =
