On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 14:32, Christian König <
ckoenig.leichtzumer...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Am 10.06.19 um 15:56 schrieb Bas Nieuwenhuizen:
> > On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 3:36 PM Alex Smith
> wrote:
> >> On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 at 13:27, Koenig, Christian <
> christian.koe...@amd.com> wrote:
> >>> Am
Am 10.06.19 um 15:56 schrieb Bas Nieuwenhuizen:
On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 3:36 PM Alex Smith wrote:
On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 at 13:27, Koenig, Christian wrote:
Am 03.06.19 um 14:21 schrieb Alex Smith:
On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 at 11:57, Koenig, Christian wrote:
Am 02.06.19 um 12:32 schrieb Alex Smith:
On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 3:36 PM Alex Smith wrote:
>
> On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 at 13:27, Koenig, Christian
> wrote:
>>
>> Am 03.06.19 um 14:21 schrieb Alex Smith:
>>
>> On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 at 11:57, Koenig, Christian
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 02.06.19 um 12:32 schrieb Alex Smith:
>>> > Put the uncached
On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 at 13:27, Koenig, Christian
wrote:
> Am 03.06.19 um 14:21 schrieb Alex Smith:
>
> On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 at 11:57, Koenig, Christian
> wrote:
>
>> Am 02.06.19 um 12:32 schrieb Alex Smith:
>> > Put the uncached GTT type at a higher index than the visible VRAM type,
>> > rather
Thanks, will have a look - can't look right now, will see if I can sometime
tomorrow.
Alex
On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 at 13:27, Koenig, Christian
wrote:
> Am 03.06.19 um 14:21 schrieb Alex Smith:
>
> On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 at 11:57, Koenig, Christian
> wrote:
>
>> Am 02.06.19 um 12:32 schrieb Alex Smith:
Am 03.06.19 um 14:21 schrieb Alex Smith:
On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 at 11:57, Koenig, Christian
mailto:christian.koe...@amd.com>> wrote:
Am 02.06.19 um 12:32 schrieb Alex Smith:
> Put the uncached GTT type at a higher index than the visible VRAM type,
> rather than having GTT first.
>
> When we don't
On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 at 11:57, Koenig, Christian
wrote:
> Am 02.06.19 um 12:32 schrieb Alex Smith:
> > Put the uncached GTT type at a higher index than the visible VRAM type,
> > rather than having GTT first.
> >
> > When we don't have dedicated VRAM, we don't have a non-visible VRAM
> > type, and
Am 02.06.19 um 12:32 schrieb Alex Smith:
> Put the uncached GTT type at a higher index than the visible VRAM type,
> rather than having GTT first.
>
> When we don't have dedicated VRAM, we don't have a non-visible VRAM
> type, and the property flags for GTT and visible VRAM are identical.
>
On 6/3/19 9:46 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
On Sun, 2 Jun 2019 at 11:59, Bas Nieuwenhuizen
mailto:b...@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>> wrote:
On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 12:32 PM Alex Smith
mailto:asm...@feralinteractive.com>>
wrote:
>
> Put the uncached GTT type at a higher index than the
On Sun, 2 Jun 2019 at 11:59, Bas Nieuwenhuizen
wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 12:32 PM Alex Smith
> wrote:
> >
> > Put the uncached GTT type at a higher index than the visible VRAM type,
> > rather than having GTT first.
> >
> > When we don't have dedicated VRAM, we don't have a non-visible
Reviewed-by: Samuel Pitoiset
On 6/2/19 12:32 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
Put the uncached GTT type at a higher index than the visible VRAM type,
rather than having GTT first.
When we don't have dedicated VRAM, we don't have a non-visible VRAM
type, and the property flags for GTT and visible VRAM
On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 12:32 PM Alex Smith wrote:
>
> Put the uncached GTT type at a higher index than the visible VRAM type,
> rather than having GTT first.
>
> When we don't have dedicated VRAM, we don't have a non-visible VRAM
> type, and the property flags for GTT and visible VRAM are
Put the uncached GTT type at a higher index than the visible VRAM type,
rather than having GTT first.
When we don't have dedicated VRAM, we don't have a non-visible VRAM
type, and the property flags for GTT and visible VRAM are identical.
According to the spec, for types with identical flags, we
13 matches
Mail list logo
