On 17 March 2017 at 14:18, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> Since we already do fabs on the one source, we're guaranteed to get
> positive infinity if we get any infinity at all. Since +inf only has
> one IEEE 754 representation, we can use an integer comparison and avoid
> all of
Reviewed-by: Elie Tournier
On 17 March 2017 at 04:18, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> Since we already do fabs on the one source, we're guaranteed to get
> positive infinity if we get any infinity at all. Since +inf only has
> one IEEE 754
Since we already do fabs on the one source, we're guaranteed to get
positive infinity if we get any infinity at all. Since +inf only has
one IEEE 754 representation, we can use an integer comparison and avoid
all of the ordered/unordered issues.
Cc: Dave Airlie
---