On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 04:55:54PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:
> > There are still some distributions trying to support unfortunate people
> > with old or exotic CPUs that don't have 64bit atomic operations. When
> >
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:
> There are still some distributions trying to support unfortunate people
> with old or exotic CPUs that don't have 64bit atomic operations. When
> compiling for such a machine, gcc conveniently inserts a library call to
There are still some distributions trying to support unfortunate people
with old or exotic CPUs that don't have 64bit atomic operations. When
compiling for such a machine, gcc conveniently inserts a library call to
a helper, but it's implementation is missing and we get a linker error.
This allows