On 2019-03-21 8:10 p.m., Liu, Leo wrote:
> On 2019-03-20 1:56 p.m., Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 2019-03-20 4:42 p.m., Liu, Leo wrote:
>>> The wait here is unnecessary since we got a pool of back buffers,
>>> and the wait for swap buffer will happen before the present pixmap,
>>> at the same time
On 2019-03-20 1:56 p.m., Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 2019-03-20 4:42 p.m., Liu, Leo wrote:
>> The wait here is unnecessary since we got a pool of back buffers,
>> and the wait for swap buffer will happen before the present pixmap,
>> at the same time the previous back buffer will be put back to
On 2019-03-21 4:15 a.m., Ernst Sjöstrand wrote:
> What's the expected change in behavior?
The change will make vl_dri3_screen_texture_from_drawable() call not to
hold the pipeline. Because of the multiple of back buffers, we can get
the texture of the ongoing presented back buffer, and no
On 2019-03-20 4:42 p.m., Liu, Leo wrote:
> The wait here is unnecessary since we got a pool of back buffers,
> and the wait for swap buffer will happen before the present pixmap,
> at the same time the previous back buffer will be put back to pool
> for reuse after the check for PresentIdleNotify
What's the expected change in behavior? Does it fix any bugs?
Regards
//Ernst
Den ons 20 mars 2019 kl 16:42 skrev Liu, Leo :
>
> The wait here is unnecessary since we got a pool of back buffers,
> and the wait for swap buffer will happen before the present pixmap,
> at the same time the previous
The wait here is unnecessary since we got a pool of back buffers,
and the wait for swap buffer will happen before the present pixmap,
at the same time the previous back buffer will be put back to pool
for reuse after the check for PresentIdleNotify event
Signed-off-by: Leo Liu
---
