On Thursday, July 20, 2017 7:29:52 AM PDT Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Chris Wilson (2017-07-20 15:15:02)
> > Quoting Kenneth Graunke (2017-07-19 21:08:23)
> > > On Wednesday, July 19, 2017 3:09:10 AM PDT Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > > Sometimes we want to emit a relocation to a NULL surface when
Quoting Chris Wilson (2017-07-20 15:15:02)
> Quoting Kenneth Graunke (2017-07-19 21:08:23)
> > On Wednesday, July 19, 2017 3:09:10 AM PDT Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > Sometimes we want to emit a relocation to a NULL surface when the
> > > constructing the batch. If we push the NULL handling into the
Quoting Kenneth Graunke (2017-07-19 21:08:23)
> On Wednesday, July 19, 2017 3:09:10 AM PDT Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Sometimes we want to emit a relocation to a NULL surface when the
> > constructing the batch. If we push the NULL handling into the common
> > brw_emit_reloc() we can make the batch
On Wednesday, July 19, 2017 3:09:10 AM PDT Chris Wilson wrote:
> Sometimes we want to emit a relocation to a NULL surface when the
> constructing the batch. If we push the NULL handling into the common
> brw_emit_reloc() we can make the batch construction itself more
> readable.
I don't like
Sometimes we want to emit a relocation to a NULL surface when the
constructing the batch. If we push the NULL handling into the common
brw_emit_reloc() we can make the batch construction itself more
readable.
On the other hand, we often test for the existence of the bo separately
and so would
