On Saturday, July 18, 2015 05:34:55 PM Francisco Jerez wrote:
This should match the set of cases in which we currently call fail()
or no16() from the emit_texture_*() methods and the ones in which
emit_texture_gen4() enables the SIMD16 workaround.
Hint for reviewers: It's not a big deal if I
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:55 AM, Francisco Jerez curroje...@riseup.net wrote:
Jason Ekstrand ja...@jlekstrand.net writes:
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 7:34 AM, Francisco Jerez curroje...@riseup.net
wrote:
This should match the set of cases in which we currently call fail()
or no16() from the
Jason Ekstrand ja...@jlekstrand.net writes:
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 7:34 AM, Francisco Jerez curroje...@riseup.net
wrote:
This should match the set of cases in which we currently call fail()
or no16() from the emit_texture_*() methods and the ones in which
emit_texture_gen4() enables the
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 7:34 AM, Francisco Jerez curroje...@riseup.net wrote:
This should match the set of cases in which we currently call fail()
or no16() from the emit_texture_*() methods and the ones in which
emit_texture_gen4() enables the SIMD16 workaround.
Hint for reviewers: It's not
This should match the set of cases in which we currently call fail()
or no16() from the emit_texture_*() methods and the ones in which
emit_texture_gen4() enables the SIMD16 workaround.
Hint for reviewers: It's not a big deal if I happen to have missed
some case here, it will just lead to an