Quoting Kenneth Graunke (2017-09-18 21:38:09)
> On Monday, September 18, 2017 11:03:37 AM PDT Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Tangential: Do we care about intel_upload_finish on batch flush any more
> > now that async access is universal?
>
> I'm not sure. We could certainly enable async maps for the
On Monday, September 18, 2017 11:03:37 AM PDT Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Kenneth Graunke (2017-09-18 18:56:56)
> > This is, by definition, finishing the batch.
> > ---
> > src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.c | 14 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
Quoting Kenneth Graunke (2017-09-18 18:56:56)
> This is, by definition, finishing the batch.
> ---
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.c | 14 +++---
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.c
>
This is, by definition, finishing the batch.
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.c | 14 +++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.c
b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_batchbuffer.c
index
