On 09/29/2014 07:46 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 30.09.2014 10:45, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 30.09.2014 07:16, Brian Paul wrote:
The screen argument isn't actually used by lp_jit_screen_init() at this
time,
I guess that's why gcc didn't warn about it?
Nope, it actually does warn about it. Mea
The screen argument isn't actually used by lp_jit_screen_init() at this
time, but let's move the call so that we pass a valid pointer.
---
src/gallium/drivers/llvmpipe/lp_screen.c |6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/llvmpipe/lp_screen.c
On 30.09.2014 07:16, Brian Paul wrote:
The screen argument isn't actually used by lp_jit_screen_init() at this
time,
I guess that's why gcc didn't warn about it?
but let's move the call so that we pass a valid pointer.
---
src/gallium/drivers/llvmpipe/lp_screen.c |6 +++---
1 file
On 30.09.2014 10:45, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 30.09.2014 07:16, Brian Paul wrote:
The screen argument isn't actually used by lp_jit_screen_init() at this
time,
I guess that's why gcc didn't warn about it?
Nope, it actually does warn about it. Mea culpa for not noticing that.
--
Earthling
