Marek Olšák writes:
> From: Marek Olšák
>
> If you want to keep it for your driver, please raise your hand.
> The prefix will probably have to be added into the driver instead of here.
>
> I cringe when I look at my long renderer string:
> Gallium 0.4 on
On 08/06/17 05:17, Timothy Arceri wrote:
On 08/06/17 12:04, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 08/06/17 05:09 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
From: Marek Olšák
If you want to keep it for your driver, please raise your hand.
The prefix will probably have to be added into the driver instead
The version number is quite useless indeed (IIRC there was a gallium 0.3
at some point but given the non-stable abi which is instead changing bit
by bit it has never been changed again).
Not sure if removing "Gallium" is a really good idea, I think it might
be helpful if you can easily see in the
On 08/06/17 12:04, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 08/06/17 05:09 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
From: Marek Olšák
If you want to keep it for your driver, please raise your hand.
The prefix will probably have to be added into the driver instead of here.
I cringe when I look at my long
On 08/06/17 05:09 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> From: Marek Olšák
>
> If you want to keep it for your driver, please raise your hand.
> The prefix will probably have to be added into the driver instead of here.
>
> I cringe when I look at my long renderer string:
> Gallium 0.4
From: Marek Olšák
If you want to keep it for your driver, please raise your hand.
The prefix will probably have to be added into the driver instead of here.
I cringe when I look at my long renderer string:
Gallium 0.4 on AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series (DRM 3.17.0 /