On Dec 5, 2016 11:43 AM, "Philipp Zabel" wrote:
Am Montag, den 05.12.2016, 11:19 +0100 schrieb Philipp Zabel:
> Hi Marek,
>
> Am Freitag, den 02.12.2016, 23:10 +0100 schrieb Marek Olšák:
> > Shouldn't this be in pipe_context if it does a copy?
Actually, resource_changed
Am Montag, den 05.12.2016, 11:19 +0100 schrieb Philipp Zabel:
> Hi Marek,
>
> Am Freitag, den 02.12.2016, 23:10 +0100 schrieb Marek Olšák:
> > Shouldn't this be in pipe_context if it does a copy?
Actually, resource_changed is not supposed to create a copy immediately.
Maybe instead of "trigger
Hi Marek,
Am Freitag, den 02.12.2016, 23:10 +0100 schrieb Marek Olšák:
> Shouldn't this be in pipe_context if it does a copy? It's basically
> the opposite of flush_resource, right?
I tried this at first (actually, at first I misunderstood the meaning of
invalidate_resource and reused that, for
Shouldn't this be in pipe_context if it does a copy? It's basically
the opposite of flush_resource, right?
Marek
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Add a hook to tell drivers that an imported resource may have changed
> and they need to update their
Add a hook to tell drivers that an imported resource may have changed
and they need to update their internal derived resources.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel
---
src/gallium/include/pipe/p_screen.h | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git