On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:54 AM, Francisco Jerez curroje...@riseup.net wrote:
Jason Ekstrand ja...@jlekstrand.net writes:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Francisco Jerez curroje...@riseup.net
wrote:
The only non-trivial thing it still has to do is figure out where to
take the src/dst
Jason Ekstrand ja...@jlekstrand.net writes:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Francisco Jerez curroje...@riseup.net
wrote:
The only non-trivial thing it still has to do is figure out where to
take the src/dst depth values from and predicate the instruction if
discard is in use. The manual
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Francisco Jerez curroje...@riseup.net wrote:
The only non-trivial thing it still has to do is figure out where to
take the src/dst depth values from and predicate the instruction if
discard is in use. The manual SIMD unrolling logic in the dual-source
case
The only non-trivial thing it still has to do is figure out where to
take the src/dst depth values from and predicate the instruction if
discard is in use. The manual SIMD unrolling logic in the dual-source
case goes away because this is now handled transparently by the SIMD
lowering pass.
---
