On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Ian Romanick i...@freedesktop.org wrote:
On 10/29/2012 02:47 AM, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
Am 28.10.2012 20:51, schrieb Kenneth Graunke:
This makes sense to me. The original reason for splitting out the ANGLE
vs. EXT bits was that the ANGLE extension only
On 2 November 2012 22:22, Marek Olšák mar...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah. However as far as I know, the desktop GL doesn't have a (good)
S3TC extension which doesn't require on-line compression. With what
you say, it looks like such an extension would be useful for us. Don't
you think it would be
Am 28.10.2012 20:51, schrieb Kenneth Graunke:
This makes sense to me. The original reason for splitting out the ANGLE
vs. EXT bits was that the ANGLE extension only requires decompression,
while the other two require both compression and decompression. So that
one could be advertised even
On 10/29/2012 02:47 AM, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
Am 28.10.2012 20:51, schrieb Kenneth Graunke:
This makes sense to me. The original reason for splitting out the ANGLE
vs. EXT bits was that the ANGLE extension only requires decompression,
while the other two require both compression and
Philipp Klaus Krause p...@spth.de writes:
Am 28.10.2012 20:51, schrieb Kenneth Graunke:
This makes sense to me. The original reason for splitting out the ANGLE
vs. EXT bits was that the ANGLE extension only requires decompression,
while the other two require both compression and
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_extensions.c |2 --
src/mesa/drivers/dri/nouveau/nv10_context.c |1 -
src/mesa/drivers/dri/nouveau/nv20_context.c |1 -
src/mesa/drivers/dri/r200/r200_context.c |1 -
src/mesa/drivers/dri/radeon/radeon_context.c |1 -
On 10/28/2012 08:09 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_extensions.c |2 --
src/mesa/drivers/dri/nouveau/nv10_context.c |1 -
src/mesa/drivers/dri/nouveau/nv20_context.c |1 -
src/mesa/drivers/dri/r200/r200_context.c |1 -
