Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 28/64] isl/state: Don't use designated initializers for buffer surface state

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 1:50 AM, Emil Velikov > wrote: > >> Hi Jason, >> >> Why do you remove the C99 initializer ? Anything wrong with using it ? >> > > Mostly readability and matching

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 28/64] isl/state: Don't use designated initializers for buffer surface state

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 1:50 AM, Emil Velikov wrote: > Hi Jason, > > Why do you remove the C99 initializer ? Anything wrong with using it ? > Mostly readability and matching what we did earlier with the other surface state struct. > > On 11 June 2016 at 17:02, Jason

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 28/64] isl/state: Don't use designated initializers for buffer surface state

Hi Jason, Why do you remove the C99 initializer ? Anything wrong with using it ? On 11 June 2016 at 17:02, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > --- > src/intel/isl/isl_surface_state.c | 46 > +++ > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 28/64] isl/state: Don't use designated initializers for buffer surface state

--- src/intel/isl/isl_surface_state.c | 46 +++ 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/intel/isl/isl_surface_state.c b/src/intel/isl/isl_surface_state.c index ca13175..2026f80 100644 --- a/src/intel/isl/isl_surface_state.c +++