On 02/08/2016 04:21 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>> On 02/04/2016 05:47 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>>> Walking the SSA definitions in order means that we consider the smallest
>>> algebraic optimizations before larger
On Feb 8, 2016 9:17 AM, "Matt Turner" wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Jason Ekstrand
wrote:
> >
> > On Feb 4, 2016 5:45 PM, "Matt Turner" wrote:
> >>
> >> Walking the SSA definitions in order means that we consider the
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
> On Feb 4, 2016 5:45 PM, "Matt Turner" wrote:
>>
>> Walking the SSA definitions in order means that we consider the smallest
>> algebraic optimizations before larger optimizations. So if a smaller
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> Good enough for me. Please add that to the commit message. R-B
Thanks, will do.
Do you plan to review any of the others in the series?
___
mesa-dev mailing list
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 02/04/2016 05:47 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> Walking the SSA definitions in order means that we consider the smallest
>> algebraic optimizations before larger optimizations. So if a smaller
>> rule is part of a larger
On 02/04/2016 05:47 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> Walking the SSA definitions in order means that we consider the smallest
> algebraic optimizations before larger optimizations. So if a smaller
> rule is part of a larger rule, the smaller one will happen first,
> preventing the larger one from
On 02/05/2016 02:47 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
> Walking the SSA definitions in order means that we consider the smallest
> algebraic optimizations before larger optimizations. So if a smaller
> rule is part of a larger rule, the smaller one will happen first,
> preventing the larger one from
On Feb 4, 2016 5:45 PM, "Matt Turner" wrote:
>
> Walking the SSA definitions in order means that we consider the smallest
> algebraic optimizations before larger optimizations. So if a smaller
> rule is part of a larger rule, the smaller one will happen first,
> preventing the
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 6:04 AM, Eduardo Lima Mitev wrote:
> On 02/05/2016 02:47 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> Walking the SSA definitions in order means that we consider the smallest
>> algebraic optimizations before larger optimizations. So if a smaller
>> rule is part of a larger
Walking the SSA definitions in order means that we consider the smallest
algebraic optimizations before larger optimizations. So if a smaller
rule is part of a larger rule, the smaller one will happen first,
preventing the larger one from happening.
instructions in affected programs: 32721 ->
10 matches
Mail list logo