On 26 September 2017 at 18:08, Juan A. Suarez Romero
wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 15:07 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 5 August 2017 at 00:25, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> > From: Emil Velikov
>> >
>> > As mentioned in
On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 15:07 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 5 August 2017 at 00:25, Emil Velikov wrote:
> > From: Emil Velikov
> >
> > As mentioned in previous commit the negative tests in dEQP expect the
> > arguments to be evaluated in
On 5 August 2017 at 00:25, Emil Velikov wrote:
> From: Emil Velikov
>
> As mentioned in previous commit the negative tests in dEQP expect the
> arguments to be evaluated in particular order.
>
> Namely - first the dpy, then the config,
On 08/09/2017 12:30 PM, Eric Engestrom wrote:
On Wednesday, 2017-08-09 08:35:04 +0300, Tapani Pälli wrote:
On 08/08/2017 08:07 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 8 August 2017 at 16:10, Eric Engestrom wrote:
On Saturday, 2017-08-05 00:25:49 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
On Wednesday, 2017-08-09 08:35:04 +0300, Tapani Pälli wrote:
> On 08/08/2017 08:07 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> > On 8 August 2017 at 16:10, Eric Engestrom wrote:
> > > On Saturday, 2017-08-05 00:25:49 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> > > > From: Emil Velikov
On 08/08/2017 08:07 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 8 August 2017 at 16:10, Eric Engestrom wrote:
On Saturday, 2017-08-05 00:25:49 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
From: Emil Velikov
As mentioned in previous commit the negative tests in dEQP
On 08/08/2017 05:20 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 8 August 2017 at 08:21, Tapani Pälli wrote:
On 08/05/2017 02:25 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
From: Emil Velikov
As mentioned in previous commit the negative tests in dEQP expect the
arguments to
On 8 August 2017 at 16:10, Eric Engestrom wrote:
> On Saturday, 2017-08-05 00:25:49 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> From: Emil Velikov
>>
>> As mentioned in previous commit the negative tests in dEQP expect the
>> arguments to be evaluated in
On Saturday, 2017-08-05 00:25:49 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> From: Emil Velikov
>
> As mentioned in previous commit the negative tests in dEQP expect the
> arguments to be evaluated in particular order.
The spec doesn't say that, so the test is wrong.
Changing it in
On 8 August 2017 at 08:21, Tapani Pälli wrote:
>
>
> On 08/05/2017 02:25 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>
>> From: Emil Velikov
>>
>> As mentioned in previous commit the negative tests in dEQP expect the
>> arguments to be evaluated in particular
On 08/05/2017 02:25 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
From: Emil Velikov
As mentioned in previous commit the negative tests in dEQP expect the
arguments to be evaluated in particular order.
Namely - first the dpy, then the config, followed by the surface/window.
Move the
From: Emil Velikov
As mentioned in previous commit the negative tests in dEQP expect the
arguments to be evaluated in particular order.
Namely - first the dpy, then the config, followed by the surface/window.
Move the check further down or executing the test below
12 matches
Mail list logo