Would be really good to extend the vec4 tests too.
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
On 22/03/18 19:05, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 03/22/2018 01:12 AM, Alejandro Piñeiro wrote:
>> Any reason to not add tests on test_vec4_cmod_propagation as the fs
>> equivalent did?
> Laziness. :)
Ok, I guess that those could be added later on a different patch,
independently of this one.
>> Also,
On 03/22/2018 01:12 AM, Alejandro Piñeiro wrote:
> Any reason to not add tests on test_vec4_cmod_propagation as the fs
> equivalent did?
Laziness. :)
> Also, two small comments below.
>
> On 22/03/18 01:58, Ian Romanick wrote:
>> From: Ian Romanick
>>
>> No changes on
Any reason to not add tests on test_vec4_cmod_propagation as the fs
equivalent did?
Also, two small comments below.
On 22/03/18 01:58, Ian Romanick wrote:
> From: Ian Romanick
>
> No changes on Broadwell and later becuase those plaforms do not use the
> vec4 backend at
From: Ian Romanick
No changes on Broadwell and later becuase those plaforms do not use the
vec4 backend at all.
Ivy Bridge and Haswell had similar results. (Ivy Bridge shown)
total instructions in shared programs: 11682119 -> 11681056 (<.01%)
instructions in affected