Ian Romanick writes:
> On 09/26/2013 09:19 PM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
>> On 09/26/2013 08:36 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>>> If bufmgr didn't get created, then screen creation failed, and we never
>>> should have got here in the first place. This was added by Chris Wilson
>>> in 2010 with no explanat
On 09/26/2013 09:19 PM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> On 09/26/2013 08:36 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> If bufmgr didn't get created, then screen creation failed, and we never
>> should have got here in the first place. This was added by Chris Wilson
>> in 2010 with no explanation for why it would be neede
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 08:36:00PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> If bufmgr didn't get created, then screen creation failed, and we never
> should have got here in the first place. This was added by Chris Wilson
> in 2010 with no explanation for why it would be needed.
Because it prevented a segfaul
On 09/26/2013 08:36 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> If bufmgr didn't get created, then screen creation failed, and we never
> should have got here in the first place. This was added by Chris Wilson
> in 2010 with no explanation for why it would be needed.
> ---
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i915/intel_context.
If bufmgr didn't get created, then screen creation failed, and we never
should have got here in the first place. This was added by Chris Wilson
in 2010 with no explanation for why it would be needed.
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i915/intel_context.c | 6 --
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_context
