On 09/02/2011 06:13 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 01:33:59 -0500, Bryan Cain bryanca...@gmail.com wrote:
With this patch, there are no piglit regressions on softpipe with native
integers enabled. Unlike my previous patch, this uses integer values of
~0 and 0 for true and false,
Are there any objections to pushing this?
Bryan
On 08/31/2011 01:33 AM, Bryan Cain wrote:
With this patch, there are no piglit regressions on softpipe with native
integers enabled. Unlike my previous patch, this uses integer values of
~0 and 0 for true and false, respectively, instead of the
On 09/02/2011 06:13 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 01:33:59 -0500, Bryan Cain bryanca...@gmail.com wrote:
With this patch, there are no piglit regressions on softpipe with native
integers enabled. Unlike my previous patch, this uses integer values of
~0 and 0 for true and false,
With this patch, there are no piglit regressions on softpipe with native
integers enabled. Unlike my previous patch, this uses integer values of
~0 and 0 for true and false, respectively, instead of the float values 1.0
and 0.0.
---
src/mesa/main/uniforms.c |6 +-
