On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 08:23:30AM +0100, Iago Toral wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 09:58 -0800, Nanley Chery wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 09:18:49AM +0100, Iago Toral Quiroga wrote:
> > > We were only resolving the first.
> > >
> > > v2:
> > > - Do not require that the number of layers on
On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 09:58 -0800, Nanley Chery wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 09:18:49AM +0100, Iago Toral Quiroga wrote:
> > We were only resolving the first.
> >
> > v2:
> > - Do not require that the number of layers on dst and src are an
> > exact match, it is okay if the dst has more
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 09:18:49AM +0100, Iago Toral Quiroga wrote:
> We were only resolving the first.
>
> v2:
> - Do not require that the number of layers on dst and src are an
> exact match, it is okay if the dst has more layers so long as
> it has at least the same that we are going
We were only resolving the first.
v2:
- Do not require that the number of layers on dst and src are an
exact match, it is okay if the dst has more layers so long as
it has at least the same that we are going to resolve.
- Do not always resolve array_len layers, we should resolve
on
